If you attacked a web server, would you go 80 or 443 and why?
If you attacked a web server, would you go 80 or 443 and why?
443, ultimately like the HeartBleed attack. But I would use an SSL attack using Netcat or Open SSL to create a simple two-line SSL proxy. Then I would listen on port 80 and redirect request to port 443 on a remote host through SSL. HeartBleed is simply a coding error exploit in the OpenSSL package versions up to and including 1.0.1f. The vulnerability allows an attacker to target SSL on port 443 and manipulate SSL heartbeats in order to read the memory of a system running a vulnerable version of OpenSSL.